Obama was NOT born in Kenya, just a bit of Clarification
Posted by Tyler Brown
Obama was NOT Born in Kenya, but he wasn't born in the US either, he wasn't even born on this planet, he was born on the planet Krypton.
His real name isn't Barack Obama, its Bar-El, although the couple that decided to raise him decided to call him Barack Obama instead.
And unlike Clark Kent, Obama isn't using his powers for the greater good of the people, but instead, the "greater" good of the Wallstreet Bankers.
He is basically Clark-Kent's evil twin.
^ thats the amazing video in which he admitted to it!
I think I might make this into a series, possibly. 
If I could find enough short clips.
This will also be posted on my blog on my profile at Geeks!
Humans and Fish CAN Coexist peacefully
Posted by Tyler Brown
^ Human Beings and Fish CAN Coexist peacefully.
Where did he say this?
^ and after 8 long years of Hard Work, George W. Bush's dream of these two species coexisting peacefully came true
http://engrishfunny.com/2009/10/01/engrish-tuna-people/
^ Original post location
Also posted on my blog at geeks.pirillo.com!
If Obama is the Joker, then who is Batman?
Posted by Tyler Brown
Ok, I'm pretty sure by now you've seen all of these Obama Joker posters, correct? Maybe even a video of Alex Jones hanging them up in his own Locale. Well, I'll post it below:
Obama as the Joker
Heres a good question. If Obama is the Joker, then who is Batman? You know, the one that will save America from this horrible joker. Well, it is, of course, Congressman Ron Paul! Founder of Campaign for Liberty, and only honest presidential Candidate in the year 2008, just take a look below:
Ron Paul as Batman
Haha. I'm sure the Batman image will probably spread as quickly as the Joker images have. 
Anyway, before I sign this off, I've got another message I hope you all like:
Don't Steal, The Government Hates Competition
Anyway, hope ya like that! =)
~ Tyler J. Brown
My views on things 2.0
Posted by Tyler Brown
Basically, as a reply to a discussion on geeks, which was long enough to qualify as a blog post I guess, I have decided to basically copy/paste it into a blog post as well (not just on geeks but also on my personal website's blog)
My view? I think we should do something we haven't done in a long time, actually follow the wishes of our forefathers, and follow the constitution that they have actually written.
I would like to live in a country where the media isn't controlled by corporations or the two major parties, but by the people. We have this illusion that we have control, but we truly don't. Only place we do have freedom to express our true opinions anymore is online, but how long is that going to last? The stimulus package almost passed with a section giving ISPs exclusive rights to do more in-depth spying on the American people, luckily that part was removed.
The root of our economic problem. The problem is our current tax and currency system. There is nothing Federal about the Federal Reserve, and Ben Bernanke and previously Alan Greenspan have had more control than Clinton, Bush, and now Obama has and will ever have when it comes to the economy. Basically because one, its not truly controlled by the government (actually, the Federal Reserve controls the government and the two major parties), and secondly, they can print money at the whim. There used to be a point where our money was backed by something, and had real value to it. Then FDR destroyed that and took us off of gold. (Obama, btw, is reminding me a lot of FDR, and that scares me in a way).
We've been stuck with a private bank controlling our currency since 1913. I will never forgive Woodrow Wilson for that. Then came income tax, though most people at the time didn't have to pay it because they didn't work for the government/weren't part of an entitlement program, that was soon fixed by creating Social Security. You can opt to get out of Social security, but than you are stuck with a Tax payers card, but thats too much hassle. I mean if we cut government spending and all of these programs that just don't work, or, just plain illegal according to the constitution because some are powers supposed to be reserved to states. Then you've got the issue that, the IRS isn't even a true governmental organization, or that amendment 16 was it, never was truly ratified. So we are basically paying an illegal income tax, which the founding fathers never wished to have. Originally, in the Constitution, it said that the Government could not tax a mans fair days wage. I think we should replace it with possibly a National Sales tax, something that isn't too high, and reflects the different levels of consumers. Those that have more money tend to buy more, and throw more of their money around, and those that have less, tend to buy less. If that trend keeps true, people may pay a more fair percentage of tax, we'd be able to fund the government, and with such a tax reform, we may actually allow the government to actually control the taxes. (you may have a couple variations here and there, but for the most part, those that have more money tend to more recklessly spend their money. Plus, it'd be much harder to get around a national sales tax when you buy retail.)
I also believe, as Ron Paul says, we shouldn't be the police of the world. Obama wants to pull us out of Iraq, ok, but he still wants us to go into Afghanistan. Also, what about the 100 other countries we almost basically have no purpose of being in. World War II ended in 1945, its 2009, we still have troops in Japan, is Obama going to do anything about that? I also very heavily agree that we shouldn't be working on our offense, but more or less on our defense. Though, we also have to remember to not cross the line from freedom to tyranny. I mean for example, the Patriot Act basically gave the government the right to tap our calls, read our e-mails, etc, etc, and for what, security? I mean sure, we haven't had an attack since 2001, but we trade freedom for security? I mean wouldn't a better security measure be just get the hell out of the Middle East, the rest of the world, and stop intervening with the rest of the worlds business. They aren't mad at us for being "free", they're mad at us for trying to control them. More of it was just going to be added to the Stimulus package. Up until just recently, there are a part in there that would have given ISPs full authority to spy on our data pretty much.
When it comes to abortion, I do agree with you that the argument that is religious backed is basically not valid. Though, I think it should be regulated. I mean somebody that is constantly working at a whore-house shouldn't be getting 5-10 abortions a year (though I do guess they contribute to stem-cell research.) Though, if you feel you aren't ready to be a parent, or some other valid reason to get one, than why should I care?
As far as Gun ownship, there are some points I agree with you on, and don't. I agree that we shouldn't own these powerful weapons that should be only for military use, and I also agree we should be able to own rifles, hand-guns, etc. For our own defense, or for hunting if one pleases to do so.
I half-agree with you on the driving issue. I think once you hit a certain age, you should have your health tests, eyesight, etc. to see if you are fit for driving, though, not ban all of it alltogether. Though, I see where you're coming from when it comes to the whole deal with Accidents. As far as getting a license taken away after an accident, in a lot of locations thats already happening, and they are making rules for teens stricter (hence why I'm waiting till I'm 18 to get my license. probably learn from my Dad), though yes, they can probably get even stricter. Hell, here in KY, if you don't keep grades up, you don't drive.
(I know I'm doing these out of order, so deal with me)
As far as legalizing pot, I totally agree with you, and I do agree with you on the driving issue. Though it'd be hard to determine sometimes without testing their breath of something. One odd thing about marijuana use is that it effects different people in different ways. Its not gonna be the same for everybody. Some people may smoke pot and be as you described, impaired thinking, etc, as if they are somewhat drunk, and other people may smoke the stuff, and may be as alert as ever.
I also agree that we are not a Christian Nation. I'm agnostic/verge of being atheist. (I'm still trying to stick under the belief of you can't prove it either way to screw it), but, yeah. I mean we were founded on the principles of religious freedoms. Problem is, religion in some areas ended up getting as bad, and as intolerant as it was back in Europe to cause them to come here. I have this belief that those that wrote the constitution, weren't that religious. I think some of them knew more than most people even know today.
Now, what about nationalizing some things? I don't really agree with that completely, though I think regulation could do a lot to improve the situation than nationalizing certain things would, primarily because of cost. Healthcare is the biggie. I mean we're already in debt, the IRS gets away with taking most of the tax money which doesn't even make it to the government, how are we going to pay for it? (Maybe the National Sales tax could help since its harder to avoid, and couple provide more than enough to pay for government functions if we cut all the crap we don't need/is illegal). Though, one thing I do believe the US government should take into their hands, and at least heavily regulate, and modify, is our energy grid. I mean, being from the state of Kentucky, we have coal mines, use coal power plants, all that stuff. You'd expect us to have some of the cheapest power bills in the country as we have some of the cheapest cigarette prices. Wrong. The state is really making no money from it, the power companies are basically paying politicians to shut up, LG&E (Louisville Gas and Electric) is owned by some company in Germany, which doesn't even really make any sense. I think what we need to do to our power infrastructure, is basically put solar panels in the Mojave (with improved solar panel tech of course), and Wind turbines in the mid-west, and we could power the whole nation. In great numbers, and creating the jobs for maintenance (which won't even cost that much, especially for solar), the whole Nation has greener energy, cleaner air, and people in the mid-west and Southwest have more jobs. I mean even Obama (one of the few things I actually agree with him on) realizes we have these untapped resources we need to get into.
Cleaning the air up, brings me onto my next point, the auto industry. The problem right now, is both parties are heavily influenced by the auto industry, and there are actually restrictions which only keeps innovation within the big three. Not to mention all the good battery technology, and alternatives which could replace our entire fuel infrastructure within a few years if we wanted to, is owned by the big three and the oil companies. If the government could only crack down on this, and then lift the restrictions that could allow more individual innovation in the auto industry, we could quickly transition to electric cars, hydrogen fuel cell cars, and many other alternatives. I don't believe we should switch to diesel because despite there being Biodiesel, and it having better MPG and such, its not a completely clean source, and still contributes to dirty air.
The primary reasons I have for supporting the two would be for cheaper power bills for one, cleaner air to breath, and more economic freedom in the auto industry.
Thats basically what I think should be done about some of the problems we face Today, and what the causes are, and what we should do to fix/get rid of those causes.
Who do I support in 08
Posted by Tyler Brown
Yay, only two days before election. Well, I figure before this day comes and passes, I will post my views on the whole election, and hope I don't get any idiots attacking my beliefs in my comment section.
So, who am I supporting, Obama or McCain? How about neither of them hypocritical phonies. Change? Ha! I doubt that will come from either major party. We've had Bush for the past 8 years, he hasn't done good, and of course, for the past 2 years, we've had a Democratic majority in Congress, and that hasn't helped us much either. Is there any party out there that is out there for the peoples inerest, and not for the parties interests, or their candidate's interests.
Very recently, I have decided to look into two different parties, the Constitution and Libertarian Partys. Chuck Baldwin happens to be the candidate for the Constitution Party, and Bob Barr is the candidate for the Libertarian Party. I feel that these two candidates are much more genuine than the Main Party options we have, and will probably do a lot more to help this country in return. What bothers me, is the fact that these candidates were not allowed to be in the debates earlier in this race, despite the fact that both of these candidates are in the ballot or can be written in in so many states, that if most of America got disgusted with Obama and McCain suddenly, they could get enough electorate votes to win.
Anyway, to continue on. Why am I supporting a 3rd party candidate? Well, although some of you may think its a waste, but you know what a real waste us? Supporting one of the lesser of two evils. The real waste is a vote for somebody that doesn't stand for what you believe in. Some on conservatives, does John McCain TRULY represent you? After Bush, and now McCain this time, do you truly believe they are conservatives? They aren't. Sarah Palin is the most conservative person in this campaign. The Republican party had a couple chances for some real good conservatives in the primaries, Ron Paul and Mike Huckabee are great, true, conservatives that would have done great for America.
Now, what about Barack Obama? Mr. Change, Barry Obama, Nobama, etc. What about this man that so many Democrats happen to be praising constantly, the media giving him a free ride. What is so great about this man? Is it because he's black? Is it cause he keeps spouting out the word change all the time? Would you be praising McCain all the time of he was Half-black, and kept spouting out the word change? Obama is a powerful speaker, and I'll give him that, but he doesn't even have a real congressional record except for voting Present on quite a few things. We can't tell whether this guy is a flip-flop, or is truly for America's best interests. He also just got into the senate. Just as insane as it was for the Republican party and conservatives to choose McCain, the Democrat Party is just as insane to put up a guy that has no real record that we can judge him upon. At least from McCain's record we can tell he's been a Flip-flop the past 8 years and kissing religious ass.
Now, whats the real difference between the two major party candidates, except that one has a record of flip-flopping and the other has yet to create one. They both voted on the bail-out bill, in fact, McCain kept endorsing it. Both major party candidates are two wings of the same crashing bird, and the problem is the fact the wings are failing. Obama and McCain are two broken wings, and we are about to put our trust into either one of these broken wings. If America was a bird, we'd definitely be going down crashing.
Why is it, that we are putting our trust in the same two major parties, each one promising something different from the previous guy, yet, does nothing but the same. Obama sounds a lot like Bill Clinton in 92, and Bill Clinton was the guy that ended up forcing banks to give out very risky loans. McCain, the maverick, despite what he stood for in 2000, sounds like he's kissing republican ass on all levels this election. Neither of these two candidates have integrity, neither of these have policies that work. Big Government has been proven to fail, and thats what we are getting with these two candidates. One more-so than the either. We have been the most successful when the government tends to stay out of things.
I was watching an episode of 20/20 in the past couple weeks, forget the hosts name that night, but he compared big government to somebody trying to dictate what you do on a skating rink instead of the people creating order themselves. You know what happened, everybody started falling down, crashing into each other, etc. Then he brings in an experienced skater to try to do the same thing, and people continue to start falling down and crashing into each other.
So what do I want? I want somebody who actually supports small government, somebody who actually wants to abide by the constitution, end the corruption of Income tax and the IRS. Somebody who isn't willing to bail out companies, or "redistribute" the wealth. I want somebody who represents the American people, and not just a party, or in it for personal gain. I want somebody who wants to protect my rights, including my second Amendment rights. I want somebody who will let Americans live their lives, and spend their money the way they want, instead of telling us how we spend our money or redistributing our money for us. If we want to donate to charity, we should have that choice to do so, or not to do so. The government perhaps is the most corrupt Charity Organization in this country.
Those are perhaps many reasons why I'm conservative. Well, because I'm conservative, you must think I don't support rights for homosexuals, or rights for this group or people, etc. Well, that is wrong. Actually, when I seen Ron Paul's take on Individual Rights, I really agreed with it. It isn't just about a group of people's rights, it just isn't Asian rights, it just isn't Hispanic Rights, Gay Rights, African-American rights. Its all about Individual RIghts and Freedoms, to live our lives the way we want to and choose to do so. Why are we focusing on a speicific group of peoples rights, that only tries to limit the freedoms of the "oppresive group". Why don't we focus on the rights and freedoms of every single individual person, and not just a specific group of people.
Next issue that comes up, is people must think, because I'm conservative, I must support the war. I admit, when I was listening to the republican party, before I started to really look into my political beliefs and look into these third parties, I agreed with McCain on issues on the war (though, not as exagerated as Democrats try to make it.) Though, after I did some research, and looked into the Third Parties, the way Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, and Bob Barr explained it, was in reference to the constitution, and not just going "Oh, what about those poor soldiers." I now believe the war shouldn't have been started the way it was, that it was unconstitutional, and that Iraq was no direct threat to us. Which brings me to my next point, when anti-war points are brought up, I prefer to see things in reference to the constitution, and not some "Hippies" crying about the soldiers over their, and the way I've heard about the war from the leftist point of view over and over again.
Abortion is another issue that comes up a lot. Now, I may personally not believe in that, as a lot of the times I've heard of it being done is when people have sex too often or at crazy parties and just want to be bailed out of the situation. There are those cases where you may not be able to afford the child, well, there are many couples out there, who are not capable of having a child, who would love to adopt. Most of the time when there are abortions, its to be bailed out of a situation and not for personal health reasons. Now, unless you absolutely need to for health reasons, which is very rare, you just shouldn't have an abortion. People may not agree with me on that, but, thats how I see things.
Gun control, thats an issue I argue about a lot of the time. I don't believe that we should loose our second Amendment rights. Many of the cities with very high crime rates, have already banned guns. In England, you hear a lot about knife-crime increasing. Now, if you take a look at Switzerland, they have a very high Gun count per capita, yet, they happen to have one of the lowest gun-related crime rates in the world? Probably because if you try to shoot somebody with a gun, the other person probably has a gun to choose back, and you don't want to take that risk. Well, despite statistics, I know quite a few people (probably from the fact I live in the South) who happen to enjoy hunting as an activity, whether it be hunting with a gun or bow-hunting. I also know some people who shoot on a range without issue. Not to mention, people tend to use very creative ways to get past gun control, whether it be killing with a knife, or with other objects. I believe one of the things that makes America great, is the fact that we have this freedom to have the choice on whether to own a gun or not, instead of having the government make that decision for us.
Now, I can continue going on talking about my beliefs, but, I might as well say who I am supporting in this race. I am supporting Chuck Baldwin and Darrel Castle of the Constitution Party. Why? Because I'd rather support somebody who can represent my beliefs, instead of one of the lesser of two evils, or, the evils or two lessers, and why does it have to be two evils? Anyway, with that on mind, I will put a great quote below my closing.
Anyway, please comment and possibly subscribe. Thanks for reading.
~ Tyler Brown (Condoulo)
"Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost." ~ John Quincy Adams